Fugger: Kristen Stewart

Recent Fugs and Fabs: Celebs in Denim


Let’s talk jeans again! (And, as ever, if you have Denim Needs, feel free to trade tips and tricks in the comments.)

[Photos: Fame/Flynet]

react:

WTF: Kristen Stewart in Chanel at the Cafe Society Premiere


Let me just say, first of all, that Kristen Stewart has turned into a much more interesting person than I would have anticipated, say, eight years ago when Twilight came out.  Plenty of actors ended up in buzzy films in 2008 and have fallen off the radar entirely — a squizz through our archives proves that, if nothing else — and while I think that K Stew is decent in the Twilight films, I’m not sure they did her justice, and as a way of introducing her to the world at large, I think they (for a while) overshadowed her skills (and her otherwise interesting taste in projects). I don’t think she was wrong to take that part — it made her a huge star, and it made her enough money that she can basically take whatever parts she wants from now on.

That musing aside, I have to note that she looks BONKERS in this Chanel number:

Amazon & Lionsgate With The Cinema Society Host The New York Premiere Of "Cafe Society" - Arrivals

I blame Karl Lagerfeld for this totally, obviously. It’s very evocative — a dash of Miss Havisham, a teaspoon of dominatrix, a giant handful of WTF — and it’s certainly not boring. It’s so not-boring, in fact, that it took me twenty minutes to realize that what I was seeing on her thighs were the inner-locking Cs of the Chanel logo, and not something written on the step-and-repeat behind her. Yes, for a whole I was trying to figure out how it was possible that Kristen Stewart, as a corporeal being, became partially transparent. I told you she was interesting.

[Photo: Getty]

react:

Fugs and Fabs: Kristen Stewart


Somewhere, I feel like SWINTON just looked at this — and by “somewhere,” I mean “probably in a tree house in as-yet undiscovered Scottish forest that exists outside of normal human longitude but still gets decent WiFi” — and nodded with approval.

Kristen Stewart Leaving Her Hotel In NYC

I’D look like a dumb-ass in this, mostly because I’d spill all over it immediately, but she looks cool and groovy and interesting. Points for sunglasses and a red lip, both of which go a long way toward making me like anything.

She wore this on Fallon last night:

Read More

react:

What the Fug: Kristen Stewart in Jonathan Simkhai


This ostensibly artsy dress is more of a Rorschach test from Satan’s own inkwell.

Kristen Stewart

I say that because when I look at it, I don’t see a house, or a dog, or even a face. I see only a screaming pelvic vortex feeding on itself.

[Photo: Fame/Flynet]

react:

Fuglight: Kristen Stewart in Preen


I can’t help but feel this was foisted upon her.

Kristen Stewart

And no, it’s not because she isn’t smiling (she was perfectly cheery in other shots; just none that showed the entire outfit). Rather, it’s because Kristen Stewart — especially with that hair — seems edgier than this. Sheer for the sake of sheer is a bland, passé eye-roll at this point; Stew seems a lot more rock and roll than a dress I would classify as Britney Spears Gets Married Again In Las Vegas Because She Lost A Bet.

[Photo: Getty]

react:

Fug or Fab: Kristen Stewart in Chanel


I know, I know. I should NOT approve of a strapless leather tube dress, BUT I CAN’T HELP IT:

GettyImages-536025250KStewChanel

I just think she looks cool. Is it the stellar red lipstick? Am I really that easy? Wait, don’t answer that.

[Photo: Getty]

react:

Fugs and Fabs: Celebs at the Airport


Ooooh, we are in full travel season, you guys. Get ready for Carry-On Bag Porn.

[Photos: Fame/Flynet]

react: