Fugger: Kim Kardashian

Fugs and Fabs: Rihanna’s First Annual Diamond Ball


When Rihanna is one of the least crazy-looking people at the party, it’s usually a sign to check for the sight of four horsemen on the horizon.

[Photos: Getty]

react:

Fug the Kardashian: Kim


I accidentally published this post blank — just the photo, not even a WORDS in sight — and that seems incredibly meta and apt, doesn’t it?

Kim Kardashian ACRIA Holiday Dinner

I mean, this is so, “Twentieth verse, same as the first.” We’ve been here, done that, bought a t-shirt we didn’t really want, and left an unpleasant one-star Yelp review that also complained about the poor quality of the t-shirt we bought that we didn’t really want.

[Photo: Fame/Flynet]

react:

Fugs and Fabs: Various People At Art Basel


I keep forgetting Art Basel happened. Other than the fact that I’ve heard it referred to as Art Boozel, I’m not even sure what it is, exactly, except an excuse for people to go to Miami and write it off on their taxes.

[Photos: Getty, Splash]

react:

Fug the Kardashian: Kim (In Her Capacity As Child-Stylist)


This might be the most normal I’ve ever seen Kim Kardashian look while out and about doing mothering-type things.

Kim Kardashian and North

But I’m not sure why North even OWNS a giant fur cape at age one-and-change, unless Kim is taking her to a very specific Come As Your Favorite Facial Hair party. In which case North will KILL as Young Sam Elliott.

Kim appears to have been playing dress-up as well, recently:

Read More

react:

WTF: Kim Kardashian


Presented without comment:

Kim Kardashian dons pink PVC dress for Fleur Fatale fragrance launch **USA, Canada ONLY**

Okay, with one comment, but it’s courtesy of Ross Geller:

DON’T take this off until you’re ready to keep it off, Kim. And whatever you do, DO NOT MAKE A PASTE.

react:

Fab and Fug the Cover: Kim Kardashian on Paper Magazine


“What’s that silly lady doing?” asked one of the beans.

Kim Kardashian: Paper Magazine, November 2014

 

What does one say to that? Oh, just drizzling Champagne into her ass glass? Or, Using her personal tray table? Pouring a tall glass of mommy juice?

I settled on, “Nothing important.”

Having said that — and I stand by it — this is actually a perfectly kicky and arresting visual for someone who surely would love it if we all believed her life involved raining Moet & Chandon all over sparkly couture. It’s chipper and it’s gleeful and it’s flaunting everything about her that she might want to flaunt — including her absurd level of fame and the Internet that helped hand it to her.But this is also one of the most photographed women in the world. We know what her body looks like. It is going to take some extreme proof to make me believe she hasn’t been given the Barbie treatment by an airbrusher, which I fear will make our younglings want to have throw-pillows surgically implanted in their nethers (which is about as real as her rear-end looks in this finished product). Kim Kardashian is not someone who can afford to be perceived as any more cartoonish than she already is, and yet here we are. So the thing is, I like the whimsy, and it’s by far the nicest of her three photos. But there’s also an “I’m famous! SUCK ON THAT, Y’ALL” aura to it that doesn’t look particularly good on her.

Speaking of Barbie, and not looking particularly good on her, the next cover is decidedly not safe for work, unless you work at a place that is pro-crack. Of the rump variety, although I guess if your office is pro-crack in terms of the drug, then a naked derriere isn’t going to faze anyone. Otherwise, tread carefully.

did i mention the nsfw thing? because it’s nsfw

react: