The Cheetah Fugs


In case you’re wondering, yes, Adrienne Bailon IS completely naked under this:

I know this not because I have a picture of the back to show you, but because I saw a photo of the FRONT after her tremendous pelvic napkin blew aside. I’m not going to post it — I have no need to show you Adrienne Bailon’s full-frontal debut, and I’m sure you’ll be able to find it elsewhere — but I can tell you that she does not have a full Brazilian. File that one under: THINGS I HAD NO DESIRE TO KNOW. Want to see it full-on? (The PG-version.)

Honey, I know it’s Vegas, but that’s not what they mean by “The Strip.”

react:
Leave a reply

Comments (114):

  1. Jenny
    +1

    agh. It’s a tummy tumor!

  2. Suchada
    0

    Does she *know* she forgot to put her skirt back in place after she peed?

  3. A.J.
    0

    What. Is. This? I can’t even…

    I used to let my children watch your movies! :(

    • Karen
      0

      “What. Is. This? I can’t even…”

      That was pretty much my reaction to a T. I can’t even begin to understand how/why this was designed or how/why anyone (in her right mind or not) would choose to wear it.

      It may be the worst thing I’ve seen on GFY in a long, long time.

    • Amy
      0

      I DON’T UNDERSTAND. But I’m upset but what I don’t understand.

  4. jellybean
    0

    this reminds me of those long underwear with the flap in the back. if you step out of the flap, it would result in this exact kind of billowy-nakedness. Oh. Honey. No.

  5. Stefanie
    0

    What?! Is this for real?

  6. Libby
    0

    Wow, so this is what happens when those oopsie crotch shots of starlets become common? Why did she bother with a skirt at all?

  7. Sandra
    0

    Why did this happen?

    • Kate
      0

      haha, it’s like some bizarre phenomenon that no one can explain. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN???

  8. I.K.
    +1

    I’m almost MORE offended by that big lump of UGH in the front than the see-through material. Almost.

    • Karen
      +2

      Actually, I AM more offended by that big lump of UGH than by the see-through material.

  9. Jenna
    0

    Why so desperate, Adrienne Bailon?

  10. Dressed Well
    0

    This is awful. When we first saw this it looked like she was completely naked apart from a jacket and massive napkin!

    • DebMoore
      0

      She is naked! The “napkin” blows to the side and you can full on see her vag. I think I saw the picture on CelbSlam. And no I am not proud of the fact I saw it.
      And like others have commented I ….just…….don’t………know……..what ????? I am so confused.

  11. Crystal
    0

    Perhaps she’s trying to get back in the good graces of the Kardashians by kdressing klike kthem.

  12. Kate
    0

    What is the black line around her hip if not part of underpants? I cannot fathom either what made her decide to lay her goods out for all to witness or what possessed her to think this ‘outfit’ was attractive.

    So, so tired of Hollywood girls looking like girls from the red light district.

    • Jessica
      0

      It’s a crease in the sheer fabric. I know.

      • Sajorina
        0

        I’ve been to Amsterdam’s Red Light District and the girls in the windows are definitely wearing underwear!

  13. Annie E
    0

    I now feel like Rob Kardashian dodged a bullet when she refused to date him again.

  14. Lynny
    0

    I just can’t get past her face. Definitely had a nose job and maybe something else. Sad that a girl that young feels the need to mess with her face AND put her lady business out there for the world to see.

    • froggiefrenchie
      0

      At that point i didn’t even notice her face. She has a giant jellyfish napkin coming out of her. i mean…it’s…i…seriously…wh…WHY???

  15. Sonya Simpkins
    0

    Who is Adrienne Bailon and why do we care about her ridiculous outfit? Seriously. Who needs attention that badly?

  16. Linda
    0

    Not to sound really stupid, but is her ass just hanging out in back? I can’t imagine…

    • Vanessa
      0

      Right?? That was my question, what is there to cover the back??

      • Karen
        0
      • Mare
        0

        Thanks Karen for the rear view link, and let me say I have never been so glad so see me some lace in my life!

      • GingerLover
        0

        Look at the back… it’s hideous…
        and if you want a laugh read what she said about it.

        “The wind blew and despite what other girls may do, this is really a terrible accident to me. I’m really upset, but I’m even more upset about what my parents might think. I want to be known for my talent. I love the idea of being sexy, but I’ve never been in this business to sell sex, I’ve been in this business to sell my talent. The truth is, when you look at the pictures, you don’t realize that the wind really did blow my dress, and I don’t really know what else to say about it.” – Adrienne Tells Global Grind

        To which I say BWA-ha-ha-ha-ha!

  17. Katherine
    0

    I….I think she outdid Erin Wasson. At least that kinda sorta made sense in a ‘it’s at least based on the form of a minidress’ way. This is just……wah?

    • unvacuous
      0

      I was about to comment WORST DRESS EVER, but then you reminded me of Erin Wasson. Actually come to think of it, Wasson’s wasn’t really a dress, more an over-crocheted thong, so perhaps I am correct.

      I think there is enough fabric there to actually make a nice dress, except whoever designed it decided to bunch it up and make it look like an explosion from between her legs. An insult to chiffon.

    • NYCGirl
      0

      I don’t know which is more ridiculous: her statement or her “dress.”

  18. celia
    0

    I get better coverage at the gynocologists.

  19. TereLiz
    0

    All I can say is…

    Cute jacket.

    I refuse to comment on the rest.

    • Christian
      0

      Yes, the jacket is nice. Aside from the obvious problems with this, erm, “outfit”, can Hollywood stop with the press-on talon nails?

  20. drPhilG
    0

    btw, as the FGs suggest it’s easy to find the photo of the full reveal (and that just looks like she visited Brazil about 2 weeks ago) there is only ONE reason to wear something like this–to tease and titilate, and thereby declare yourself beyond the pale. Is that what we really want our celebrities for? Perhaps, but some of them earned their celebrity status through hard work and talent, rather than their willingness to show off their body parts. This is about as low as it gets, IMHO.

    • Jessica
      0

      The back, it turns out, is not totally sheer: there’s like a floral patch on the, er, crack. (I just found some pics.) I just…you know…wear some undies.

      • Lynn
        0

        Jessica – I just saw the back, too. Is that a giant gold exposed zipper? Man, this dress has EVERYTHING going for it.

  21. Jen
    0

    There are way too many villains here! someone designed it, someone produced it, someone bought it, someone wore it, and someone didn’t Step In With a Cautionary Word.

    Oh my. Poorly played all ’round

  22. Lisa
    0

    No words are strong enough to explain my hatred of this item of “clothing”. Ick.

  23. The Other Molly
    0

    I’m SO TIRED of young women who used to be idols for little girls going skank ho.

  24. D
    0

    Oh COME ON, Adrienne! Everybody knows its cleavage OR vulva…not BOTH!

  25. Fatima
    0

    This is NOT a dress. It is an extremely large bib posing as a dress.
    Apparently she has a clothing line coming out this September with a designer and this is one of the atrocious designs. They should just quit now. This is horrific.

    • sacchrainkiss
      0

      Whom exactly are they supposed to be designing for? Not to be crass but there is really only one type of person I can imagine would want to wear something like this…

  26. Rowynn
    0

    Even if it was reasonable and acceptable to design/wear something like this, this one would still be stupid-looking. What the HELL is the thing in the front? Shouldn’t clothes, even revealing ones, you know…. look like… clothes? That just looks like they draped a sheer curtain panel around her neck, belted it at her waist, and wadded up the rest and stapled it together. My cousins and I made prettier things than this from the dress-up box when we were little.

    • Michelle
      0

      This is exactly what I was going to say. Even if the black part was opaque rather than sheer, it’s a ridiculous design. it doesn’t make ANY sense, unless she was planning on stuffing some bread rolls and silverware in her napkin puff and then running away.
      But then… the… just. What? WHY would she do that. There is NO conceivable way she thought that she was absolutely risk-free from exposure.
      Just… what a bad life choice.
      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… I miss when the most risqué thing about Hollywood was Britney Spears tying up her shirt in Hit Me Baby… those were innocent times.

  27. starpig
    0

    Who is this?

  28. Siobhán
    0

    This was in New York, not Vegas.

    At least she has some lace and a zipper to cover her butt crack? I’m sure even the designer didn’t mean for women to actually leave the house in it unlined and everything. And if so, he and she both should be sent to fashion prison, where you sew granny panties and they serve you your porridge with a heap of dignity.

  29. BrownEyedBetty
    0

    I’m not convinced this one was even worthy or your time and attention, Fug Girls. It’s not remotely connected to fashion in any way. It’s not even funny. And funny is what you do best.

  30. Travis Harrison Lafferty
    0

    You guys! This dress would be TOTALLY cute at the Adult Entertainment Expo… Or maybe like the premiere of ‘Rock of Love Bus: Flav’s Revenge’ or something… DON’T HATE!

    Seriously though, the main issue I have with this, all nudity aside, is that weird protrusion in the front. Anyone who makes a dress that looks like you scrunched your skirt up and duct taped it to your torso is the devil.

  31. Katherine
    0

    Quote- (from NY Daily News) “Despite what other girls may do, this is really a terrible accident to me,” she told Global Grind. “I’m really upset, but I’m even more upset about what my parents might think..”

    Umm..riiiiight, sweetheart. Because this wasn’t the most preventable incident ever. I’m so very sure you’re broken up about it.

    • Kara
      0

      Right? I mean, you know what I did NOT do today? Or yesterday, or the day before, or ever? Flash my vulva. And it required absolutely zero effort on my part. I love a mini, but a) not a transparent mini, and b) that is precisely why underwear exists. This is totally her fault. I mean, we could shift some blame on the folks who allowed it to exist in the first place, but she’s the one who chose to wear it.

    • Kimberli
      0

      I read that comment and basically, I was like, “Girl, puh-lease.” And it makes me wonder exactly how much wind was required to blow that, um, thing aside. And who knew there would be any sort of draft in the outside world? This whole deal reeks of desperation and skankitude.

  32. vandalfan
    0

    This looks like she was going to town with some random dude in a bar bathroom, and just managed to yank her dress over her neck when the cops burst into the stall.

  33. Caroleena Stantonova
    0

    When in HO-ville…

  34. April
    0

    Wait. (I’m not trying to suggest we do this, but I’m curious). Isn’t indecent exposure illegal in NY? Can’t she be arrested and convicted as a sex offender for this? Or does it not count because she’s at a private event? Really though, it would have been SO simple to tack down more fabric and prevent this from happening.

  35. Jo
    0

    Just…WTF?!!!

  36. Anu
    0

    and this,child, is how the term “show business” came into being.

  37. sandy
    0

    Why did this happen? So people would talk about her. Mission accomplished!

    Seriously, if she had worn a normal dress, even if it was fabulous, no one would say anything. Because she is “one of those girls that was on that kids show with that other girl who I think might have been a Cosby kid or something.” And that is only to the moms who have teenage daughters.

  38. Joyce
    0

    What in the world?????

  39. christine christine
    0

    That is the stupidest excuse for a dress that I have EVER seen!

  40. Charlotte
    0

    I am *so* ready for the “tee hee, I’m not wearing panties on the red carpet” thing to stop. Ladies! Line it up!

  41. mepe
    0

    I think this might be the dumbest outfit I’ve seen since the Peldon’s stopped showing up at events. Maybe she’s wearing it as an anniversary gift to the fug girls.

  42. Jamie
    0

    She kind of looks like Jennifer Grey — specifically, it looks like she has Jennifer Grey’s new nose and cheekbones… it’s weird.

  43. TaraMisu
    0

    I really have no words.

  44. Lilibet
    0

    Following the link to the rear view from Karen, I get the impression there was a wind machine handy and someone got that “breeze” going as a ….payback/prank/ joke. She had it coming.

  45. Chesty McNagnag
    0

    Once I saw the front angle, I was actually no longer bothered by her “dress” but by her horrid set of implants!

  46. cynic
    0

    *sigh* I miss the days when there was a little left to the imagination.

    I’m thinking she’s got the ‘Skank of the Year’ award nailed… and it’s barely March.

  47. Maisie
    0

    Making this, um, ensemble even more–jeez, I’m at a loss to come up with the perfect adjective, actually; horrific? embarrassing?–according to Huffington Post, ” The dress is a sneak peek of her upcoming fashion line collaboration with Dominique Auxilly, which she claims will debut during NY Fashion Week in September.” OK, Fug Girls, you simply MUST cover THAT show!

  48. Sajorina
    0

    This irrelevant girl is obviously made of plastic and filled with saline and skinboosters, so are we even sure she was showing the vulva she was born with or the one her plastic surgeon gave her? Either way, this is INEXCUSABLE, INAPPROPRIATE, DISGUSTING & FUGLY! And, it shouldn’t be called fashion, just barely-covered nudity! Yuck…

  49. Danna
    0

    I believe we have the 2012 winner for Fug Madness. I can’t imagine anything worse than this.

    • Chris
      0

      The only saving grace is that we can forget about this until 2013.

      However, I do have to condemn Adrienne for Momsening Fug Madness ’13 about a week into the eligibility period. Where’s the fun if we already know the winner?

      I also have to condemn her for the possibility she is going to market this thing. To other women. Who are not going to the gynecologist. Not only is it scandalous, it’s ugly on its own merits – even if it didn’t have a sheer miniskirt, WHY would you have a gigantic ruffle over your front?

      And even her booties are see-through. Why would you do that to yourself? More importantly: Why would Louboutin do that to women?

  50. corriner
    0

    my poor eyes…

  51. CampCounsellor
    0

    This is a new benchmark.
    Seriously.
    THIS. IS. THE. WORST!

  52. Jinxed
    0

    I have to say, the outfit makes as much sense as the ENTIRE EVENT! This was a …thing… Caesar’s was running in THREE cities. New York, where this… mess… was seen, Chicago, and in LA at HoHi. A HUGE event to get more people to go to Caesar’s to lose money in these high rollin’ times. Gag.

    Because casinos are all about the impression you make at the front, and who cares about covering the back of the house!

  53. Fiona K
    0

    STD!

  54. Mahastee
    0

    My pearls are about to be clutched right off their strings.

    Even if she thought this dress was a good idea (it wasn’t) she could have worn a thong, as the creases at the side make it look like she is anyway. Or some lacy granny panties, all the cool kids seem to be doing granny panties these days. Or even a full bodysuit/leotard thingamy. Or even just safety-pinned the back of the napkin to the hem of her “dress” to breeze-proof it.

    And the whole “…this is really a terrible accident to me… I’m even more upset about what my parents might think. I want to be known for my talent. I love the idea of being sexy, but I’ve never been in this business to sell sex, I’ve been in this business to sell my talent…”
    Puh-LEAZE. Find yourself a mentor who HAS some talent, hone your craft, and PUT SOME GODDAMN UNDERWEAR ON. YOU’RE MAKING ME ALL CAPSY!!!

    I find it sad that any young woman thinks it’s okay to go to a function wearing anything like this.

  55. Kathleen
    0

    If you look at her face (I know it is hard to tear yourslef away from the train wreck under her face) she is almost smirking. Like maybe it wasn’t all an accident, just got a bit windier than it was supposed to. Shame on her.

  56. Heta
    0

    When I first glanced at the photo, I thought, “How unfortunate; this poor girl just lost her pants and has to hold her jacket over her crotch for coverage,” before I realized that, no, she intended to look like that. Gah!

  57. Melissa
    0

    Is Adrienne Bailon Hayden Panettiere’s Snooki-tinged twin?

    • Christine
      0

      All I can think when I look at her face is Hayden Panettiere!!! They could be sisters!

  58. Heta
    0

    Her shoes are ugly, too.

  59. Guerra
    0

    How embarrassing !

  60. Sarah
    0

    Wow, This is AWFUL! And I guess March Fugness is now obsolete since we clearly have a winner. Thanks for compounding the awfulness whoever you are!

    • Nicco
      0

      I know, we are barely into March and we already have ‘The Year’s Worst’. Way to spoil the fun, Bailon.

  61. Nicco
    0

    As a guy, I haven’t had occasion to wear a dress (honest) but I am pretty sure you have to step INTO them when you put them on, not throw round your neck, cinch it with a belt, and call it good. Or maybe I am misinformed.

  62. lulubelle
    0

    I don’t know what’s worse, that she wore this (having had, I assume, some discussion with her equally culpable stylist), or that someone designed/executed this dress for consideration. Check out DListed today for some across the pond celebrity who wore a cutaway unitard barely covering her nipples and ladybits on the red carpet … and that’s it. Next up: body painting only. Then full nudity. Then the Mayan prophecy will be realized.

    • Kimberli
      0

      I would respect this girl more if she were nude. At least it would be honest. This whole I’m-so-mortified-who-knew-the-wind-would-blow-aside-my-crotch-cloud deal is pathetic.

  63. Pandakeeper
    0

    I actually own boots similar to hers, but I think mine are prettier (black lace instead of some faux animal print).

    Shame about the dress. The back is actually rather cool. Love the design, just not the see through. If I were re-designing this, I would put a nude lining underneath and smooth out the front billowy thing by about 5 yards of fabric. Therefore, the vag snafu never would have happened.

    But this is my version.

  64. carol
    0

    Hilarious! Looks like she caught the table cloth in her fly. Comedy gold, whoever you are!

  65. Kimberli
    0

    Does it make me gross if I wonder who is scrubbing down the chairs this young woman sat in during the evening?

  66. e
    0

    A seriously incomprehensible pile of fabric vomit. The “designer” as it were should be lead to a torturous “sewing” death.

  67. birdbrain
    0

    Jeez, and I thought Little Kim dressed badly. I stand corrected.

  68. Crystal
    0

    Two days later, this outfit still irritates me. A lot.

    I think one of the things that bothers me is that she’s trying to be so coy, innocent, and supposedly embarrassed about the outfit. Hey, when I wear a deep v-neck shirt, I physically and mentally prepare myself for some possible nip slip. When you wear a SHEER SKIRT, be prepared for people to see your eager beaver.

  69. Allee
    0

    This outfit ALONE should give her an automatic pass to the final round in Fug Madness. This is the hot mess by which all other hot messes should be measured. No fashion, no excuses, just FUG.

  70. patuxxa
    0

    This reminds me of the birth scene on Alien, but with a parachute instead of an extraterrestrial parasite.

  71. neiges
    0

    Less is not always more, I say.

  72. Ranee Singleton
    0

    Wow. If that is a dress, she forgot to put it on.

  73. Lynn Baber
    0

    I think this may be the ugliest dress I have ever seen in my life.

  74. Lily1214
    0

    Gosh, some people are SO involved with themselves.