Fugly Gaga


Lady Gaga has been back on the radar for, like, an hour, and I’m ALREADY OVER HER again.

And I was JUST thinking to myself how nice it is that she’d been doing some photos and whatnot looking more like her natural self. I was referring mostly to her FACE. I did not mean that I needed to see ALL OF HER NATURAL SELF. BEDAZZLED BODY CONDOMS ARE NOT CLOTHES.

It gets worse, and please know that this is probably not safe for work.

Idiotic shock value. I hate to tell her this, but Rose McGowan did it first, a long time ago. So it’s DERIVATIVE shock value, which feels like it would be the greatest crime of all in her ledger.

Over it. I am Denver and she is sea level and I am a mile OVER IT.

[Photos: Pacific Coast News]

react:
Leave a reply

Comments (61):

  1. Heather
    +13

    There is a creepy guy who texts me, asking for pictures of my ass. Now I can send him this one!

    I need to figure out how to block texts…

    •  jay
      +2

      if you have a droid, there’s an app called “sms blocker” that does exactly what it says on the tin. for which I am eternally grateful

    • HelenBackAgain
      0

      Most providers will block texts for you for free, for a certain amount of numbers, as well as calls. No app needed. Call them if it isn’t clear how to do it on their website. They’ll help.

  2. Emily
    +13

    I was on board with the wacky and couture outfits, but now it’s just bras and thongs with huge heels all the time. I guess she’s just too tired to try anymore.

    And off topic, but doesn’t her boyfriend have a problem with her dressing like this??

    • Sandra
      +36

      Or her mother, or any human being with the ability to see?

    • Brenna
      +71

      Honestly, even though I endorse this outfit in no way (it’s not even creative for her anymore), if her bf had an issue with her dressing like this, she should still dress however she wants. If he has an issue, that’s on him, since she was dressing like this long before they started dating.

    • India
      +17

      Do you really think someone who would be Lady Gaga’s boyfriend would have a PROBLEM with this?

  3. Lizzy
    +31

    In the 2nd photo, is she looking back on the shark she’s just jumped?
    I’m really here in Denver, and I, too, am over it.

    • Mo
      +8

      I’m currently 35 ft above sea level, and I’m so over it, we need a new word for over.

      • C-No
        +4

        I am AT sea level (ok, I’m on the eighth floor of an office building, but I can see the sea from here) and I am SO WITH YOU. OVER. IT.

  4. lavonspants
    +18

    We get it, Gaga. You got “fat,” now you’re not anymore. Now put it away again, please.

  5.  jay
    +9

    all I can think of is how scratchy and irritating all those crystal thingies must be when you have nothing underneath.

    • ohsohappy
      +1

      LOL No kidding! Just what did her skin feel like the next day with all those scratches. Owweeee!

      • Val
        +2

        I hope she ended up with a wretched rash and/or hives because this woman is due for some poetic justice.

  6. qwertygirl
    +5

    Oh Stefani. Go put some clothes on.

  7. Tagatha
    +10

    At first glance, I thought she was wearing bubble wrap.

  8. Rowynn
    +27

    In the beginning, weren’t her outlandish getups supposed to be artistic statements? The meat dress, for example. I was somewhat grossed out by that, but I did see the point she was going for. But going out in your underwear… what’s the statement there? The only statement that comes across to me is, “I have very bad judgment, and no desire to get along in society.” She may think she looks edgy and cutting edge, but I think she just looks stupid. Of course, I’m not her target audience, so what I think couldn’t matter less.

  9. Fawn
    +53

    I will say this… her ass does look awesome. However, it would look even more awesome in say, a pencil skirt, or a mini skirt, or some great skinny pants… OR ANYTHING THAT IS CLOTHES.

  10. Erika
    +26

    I have nothing to say about this–but ads featuring the Biebs are showing up on BOTH sides of GFY. It’s like a special kind of torture.

  11. Rhiannon
    +14

    Lol at the STOP sign above her head in the first picture. All that needs saying really.

  12. Jacquilynne
    +5

    I do not approve of bedazzled body condoms, but I find this one sort of intriguing. It almost seems to stand apart from her skin, even though it’s got to be skin tight, and in the light, the whole thing makes her look like she’s been badly photoshopped into these photos and is surrounded by terrible blending artifacts.

    Which would be, if that were the point of this outfit, actually sort of interesting and cool. Sadly, I suspect her point is probably a lot more banal.

  13. Stefanie
    +4

    Remember when we thought the tea cup was obnoxious. Those were the days.

    Did she just hit her head in the first picture?

    • ohsohappy
      +1

      No, she didn’t hit her head, she is scratching…this thing she is wearing is so irritating that even her head itches.

  14. MissTee
    +14

    This is not hygienic.

    • Mooody
      +5

      Yes, this! Especially since the caption I saw was that they were going in to dinner. If you want to be naked in public, surefinewhatever. Just please, for the sake of us all but especially the next person who has to sit in that chair, put a napkin or something down before your lady bits come in contact with it.

  15.  TaraMisu
    +4

    *sigh* I am in the group that used to appreciate her “arty” costumes. Now I’m just annoyed when I see her. Put on some clothes. Anything.

  16. Esme
    +10

    If she was so contented and comfortable as she claimed during her chubby stage, why is she now whipping her butt out for everyone to see now that she’s back in shape?

  17. bookworm1973
    +18

    “…please know that this is probably not safe for work…”

    That’s not safe for anything.

  18. Bella
    +17

    Is this even legal? And the stupid shoes!! Did she not learn anything with a screwed up hip?

    I will always maintain that if one has talent, it will speak for itself. There’s not much of it around and gimmicks abound.

    • Rowynn
      +8

      Yeah, I wondered about that, too. Do ritzy, high-priced nightclubs not have a dress code of any kind? I mean, I know it would have to be a fairly liberal dress code, but shouldn’t they require that people not show up in just their underwear? A guy can’t even go in 7-11 barefooted and shirtless, so how come Gaga gets to run around in her bra and panties?

      • HelenBackAgain
        +4

        Well, I guess once you’re inside, it’s private property?

        I once called an unfamiliar venue at which I was meeting a date to ask if they had a dress code. The Irish-accented man who answered the phone replied cheerfully, “Nope! You can come naked if you like!”

  19. cruzilla
    +5

    I think we are all missing the important point that we should be grateful that she is wearing anything at all beneath the bedazzled body condom!

  20. HelenBackAgain
    +4

    This is sufficiently reminiscent, IMO, of the infamous Rose McGowan almost-dress, that I think it should be a “Who Fugged It More?”

    My answer is, unequivocally, Gaga. Not only because Rose looked gorgeous, if illegally so, but also because something so bare was truly shocking then!

    Now it’s old hat.

  21. Susan
    +7

    Time and again — and this is one of those times — I am so, so glad not to be a parent. I don’t know how (ie, with what words, under what circumstances, and with what success rate) parents of today’s teenagers would reasonable explain and attempt to enforce such notions as privacy/private parts; safe, consensual sex; giving and insisting upon receiving respect; sexual objectification and the individual right to choose when to display one’s body in a provocative manner, how much, why, and to whom; and all that other healthy sex stuff, when they constantly have this kind of thing to contend with. Brr, it gives me the chills.

    • Valerie
      +2

      You don’t understand how to explain consensual sex to your kids if someone is scantily dressed? I’m glad you aren’t a parent either, good god.

      • HelenBackAgain
        +22

        That was not called for.

      • Susan
        +5

        Yes Valerie, I would think it would be a difficult task to raise a young girl these days when our society so blatantly promotes, endorses, perpetuates, etc. this kind of constant, needy clamoring for sexual attention. But, I guess that’s because I’d be starting from the position that that kind of neediness is sad, pathetic, and beneath me, and therefore I wouldn’t want it for my daughter. If you don’t agree with that basic proposition, then naturally we would disagree on the rest of the issue.

  22. Steph
    +6

    I feel like we have seen so much almost nudity from the likes of gaga, Miley, etc. that they would actually make a bigger statement by covering up the goodies. Seeing them bare it all just makes me say “meh. Moving on.”

  23. Sarah L.
    +5

    I love that Taylor Kinney is wearing all the clothes possible though and totally dressed down. Hat, sweater, jeans, tennis shoes — they are in completely different climates (possibly on completely different planets).

  24. TonyG
    +10

    She went scuba diving, got caught in a fisherman’s net.

    The fisherman, who happened to be a designer, reeled her in, whereupon he sewed her up and threw her back into the water.

    She was found by the Coast Guard and transferred back to shore where her limo picked her up.

  25. Shannon
    +5

    I just cannot with this woman, and have never been able to. I’ve always thought her gimmicky costumes were stupid and ridiculous. She’s the world’s biggest attention seeker.

  26. Bambi Anne Dear
    +1

    While I agree that this is far too little modesty for a public appearance other than as some sort of costume, you have to admit that the effect of those spangles work fantastically well in outlining the limbs.

    • Katherine
      +1

      But they would equally well with an opaque lining- Imagine it with a pearl or silver lining, and as a slinky dress, not a jumpsuit. Beautiful and exactly as etherial, with no burnt retinas!

  27. Chris P
    +4

    Well, her ass IS spectacular. I would have been better off not having that knowledge confirmed again, but it’s Gaga, so I can’t really expect anything different.

    Honestly, though, like I’m probably one of the biggest Gaga defenders on GFY, and even I’m over it. I mean, she’s literally running out of ways to show us her panties. (That said, I’ve had her new song on loop all day today. It’s catchy, dammit – and honestly, I like it more than at least 90% of the stuff on Born This Way and possibly The Fame Monster.)

    • HelenBackAgain
      +3

      As a musician and singer, I think she’s terrific.

      But if she isn’t going to wear the crazy costumes anymore (which I thought were fun), why THIS instead? I mean, if you’re Gaga, and you don’t feel like spending five hours getting dressed, just put on some cute jeans and a T-shirt, and rest on your considerable talent, is my feeling.

  28. Mjx
    +1

    Maybe this is her way of saying she’s bored with the whole OTT Lady Gaga thing, and will now switch to wearing perfectly tailored, sophisticated outfits and move in a sort of torch singer direction… she has the voice to do it, and no one else, is, really, so..?

  29. Sajorina
    +4

    I literally want to forget she exists!

  30. SPJava
    +1

    I’ve always been happy for her to just exist as the voice from the radio or CD or where ever her music is playing. I don’it want to look at her, I never have liked looking at her (she has always creeped me out) and if I never had to see her again fine by me.

  31. kidney disease
    0

    Wonderful post, keep up with the hard work, you’re doing the work right!
    kidney disease http://renalfailure.angelfire.com/index.html