Fug The Road


Let me begin with how HAPPY I am that Kristen Stewart has another movie out, because I feel like I’ve exhausted every play-on-fug with all the titles on her resume that I remember without the aid of IMDb (and I didn’t want to have to dig up In The Land of Women, because I promise you nobody wants that).

Now let us move on to the formal shorts — and yes, I checked other pictures, and they really do appear to be shorts.

I really do not like the aesthetic here — it’s the blah old black-on-taupe thing, shot through with equally fatiguing lace and a shot of tiresome sideboob. I don’t think this piece adds anything fresh nor delightful to any of those things. Well, perhaps there is one angle: I cannot be completely sure whether those are separates, or all one outfit. We could be in Lingerie-Romperville, an exclusive and very snooty hamlet in Intimates County that doesn’t tax its residents because the personal price of being seen in one is toll enough.

[Photo: Getty]

react:
Leave a reply

Comments (26):

  1. vron
    0

    I think her face looks good! Maybe (gasp) a bit of a smile? Plus I like her makeup (if I continue to hate her disheveled hair).

    • KB
      0

      I thought this too – finally we see a somewhat jovial look on her face instead of that sullen starlet crap. Love the make-up, too – finally she is neither sans fards nor raccoon-eyed.

      Now … is it wrong that I would like to see her get a trainer? (Assuming she doesn’t have one.) She’s one of those skinny-but-untoned types and just looks kind of soft and sickly.

  2. Eliza Bennett
    0

    Aargh, the unrepentant sideboob.

  3. Stefanie
    0

    Im choosing to focus on the fact that her head looks really good. Being done with Twilight seems to be suiting her.

  4. Brenna
    0

    Her makeup looks great – I even like her hair. I’m not crazy about the outfit or the shoes, but she does have killer legs. It makes me want to go to the gym.

    • paige
      0

      Her legs are fine, but they are a result of her being naturally thin, not of working out. An example of thin legs achieved from working out would be Carrie Underwood, or even Kate Middleton.

  5. CakesOnAPlane
    0

    that takes some textile-based magic, to make tiny Kristen look this lumpy and bumpy up top…and also, is that a gap in the front button seam???

  6. Sandra
    0

    Oh dear!

  7. Nancy
    0

    outfit is horrible but she looks awesome. confused.

  8. TaraMisu
    0

    SHE looks great… the romper, not so much. It looks like something I attempted to sew in Jr high… and the shoes are fugly.

  9. Peggy L.
    0

    Have to throw in with everyone else-SHE looks great, but the Victoria’s Secret knockoff from eBayis not a great choice. But, if it makes her look this relaxed, I am all for it.

  10. roser
    0

    For me, she just never gets it right. This is a mess. Formal shorts?

  11. Helen
    0

    Still too much foundation, but, big improvement in the makeup. Hair is nice!

    The outfit, however, looks like something Belle de Jour would wear to greet a client, either in his room or her apartment. Belle would have the good taste to never, never wear it outside.

  12. Alma
    0

    Ugh I hate those shoes. And paired with the shorts, her legs just look….spaghetti-y?

  13. Susan
    0

    She looks great. I love this whole look. The shoes go with the shorts.

  14. Rayna
    0

    Can’t believe I actually used to LIKE this black lace over taupe thing.

    Nothing against K Stew, but this romper (yeah, I think it’s one piece) is one reason I no longer do.

  15. mary lou bethune
    0

    She never runs out of bad taste. She is looking pretty and clean ‘though.

  16. TonyG
    0

    I don’t know if this is a romper. If it is a romper, then in the magnified version of the pic you can see there are serious seam issues going on at the waist — check out the right side (our right, not her right) where there is definitely separation between top and bottom.

    I think it’s formal shorts. The top seems tucked to me because of the asymmetry of how it enters the pants.

    If I’m right, I don’t mind the shorts, but the top design I hate and it doesn’t fit quite right (a smidge too small? bra support needed?).

    I do like the shoes, though not with this outfit.

  17. gypsy
    0

    The top has a very “Gunne Sax” gone wild vibe.

  18. Sajorina
    0

    I love it! 14 year old me desperately wants to wear that shirt & shorts set! And, now, 34 year old me wants to desperately wear those booties! COVET! She looks so pretty… FAB!

  19. house mouse
    0

    I don’t love the way that thing is fitting her, but her hair and make-up look great and she seems a lot less sour than usual, so I’ll take it.

  20. Erin
    0

    I kind of hate myself for saying this, but…I think girlfriend is kinda pulling this off? Maybe it’s because her face looks great and she’s almost *gasp* smiling!
    That being said, I would make the shorts solid black. And can we maybe put a COLOUR under all this black lace? One that doesn’t run in the nude/taupe/beige family? I’M JUST SO BORED OF BLACK LACE OVER NUDE.

  21. bavyeshlifesciences
    0

    Hey there , it was a wonderful publish for genuine about femdom! Thank you and I enjoy for real mistresses!

  22. Lila
    0

    Okay, everybody please stop with the *gasp*ing. She smiles plenty nowadays. Her sullen face is a thing of past Twilight press tours.

    And anyway, this thing is ugly and unflattering, but it’s not the ugliest thing she’s worn. I think it might’ve looked good if it was shapelier. It looks like what I wear to bed.

  23. Lily1214
    0

    Stretch lace and shorts. Wonderful.