I almost want to fab her just because she DID turn out to be wearing underwear. Curse you celebrities, see what you’ve done to my standards!
NO. If it shows your undies, it is not formal wear. Isn’t that Newton’s 4th law or something? I refuse to say it’s gorgeous if it would make my husband uncomfortable if I were there!
I do like the colors.
BUT NO. NO PANTY FLASHES.
Yes. I DO NOT WANT TO SEE YOUR UNDERWEAR.
Sorry for shouting, but honestly, it shouldn’t even have to be said.
This had so much potential! Too much slitting and panty flashing…
Whoever that is standing next to her looks Amish in comparison. I love Jessica’s dress, it’s a great color and everything, but dang, DIAL THE EXPOSURE DOWN. At least halfway down your thighs, preferably.
Sparkly Skank should not be a goal, Jessica. You’re a very pretty girl. Don’t do that to yourself. Also, is she attending this event with Marcia Brady? Who is that girl?
I was hoping someone here would say that other chick’s name, because I like HER dress.
I wonder if this dress was actually finished before she borrowed it?
I saw this on another website and I has hoping you would show it.
It’s pretty (Im not even acknowledging the Vag window. LA LA LA) but isn’t it a little PROM looking? I would have given my left leg for it in 2003.
I don’t like this dress at all. Definitely prom looking.
At least her friend looks pretty…? It is incredibly promified. And I DO NOT understand the beige shoes with it. Wha?
Call me crazy but her face reminds me of Jessica Biel.
I’m more concerned about what appeared, on first glance, to be very large scars on her shoulder blades. Like, she had a shoulder bladectomy. Upon closer inspection, I think it’s an illusion caused by the lighting, and also by some sort of weird tat on the left side.
Yes, at first I thought they were burn marks and I was concerned. (Then she turned around and I became VERY concerned — ack!) But the shoulder blade issue is just lighting. So that’s a relief, at least.
Does the dress have an exposed zipper? Even full size I don’t understand the knotted black strip down the back of the dress.
Whatever merit the dress has is erased by the hideous tattoos … the whole thing is a hideous vision in sparkles …
This. Tats make anything look trashy. Combine tats with excessive slits and panty flash and she might as well be putting on 3 shows a night at The Body Shop.
What they said. Tattoos are a blight on our culture.
Now, all you damned kids… Get off my lawn
Call me cranky, if you will, but I am So. F’ing. Tired of tattoos.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Panties on the red carpet is an absolute NO!
Let’s go ahead & say no panties on any carpet, ever. (Except if carpet is being used as an EWWWWphemism; cover up THAT carpet.) Other than that if there are visible panties on the carpet you’re just being a bit to showy, slobby or slutty. Sometimes all three.
The fabric is gorgeous.
Her legs are gorgeous.
Her gynecologist is probably gorgeous, but most certainly not me.
I’d give it a fug, because 1) she’s accessorizing with her underwear AGAIN, and 2) if you’re going to accessorize with your perineum, GO BIG OR GO HOME. Use Bella Swan as your muse. Put so many Swarovski crystals on it, Jennifer Love Hewitt is reduced to tears.
We should be blinded not because we nearly saw your labia, but because the shine radiating off of your vaginal region is brighter than a thousand suns.
What an awesome rant.
That’s an awful lot of of fabric for such little coverage. Even the top seems one tug away from a nip-flash.
Aside from all of the flashing, is it also not flattering from the back? She has a perfect body and looks kind of shapeless and large in this thing from the back.
I don’t care if you are one of the fiercest models ever to prowl a catwalk, or how great your legs are, or how well you are rocking a slit, if I can see your underwear and your dress is not see-through**, you need to PUT THE VAG AWAY. If the slit were 6 inches lower, the ensemble would be hot, not trashy. But as is, it’s Dumpsterville.
I also don’t like the tattoos, but that’s personal preference.
**See through-dresses: Equally wrong for similar put-it-away-based reasons, but not what we’re dealing with here.
You actually “Fug or Fab”‘d this with a slit so high that her underwear is showing?
I hate Jessica’s dress… HATE, I tell you! It’s pageant goes wild! Flashing is never OK, but after she wore that white lace jumpsuit sans bra, nothing she does surprises me anymore! And, really, she couldn’t find sparkly blue underwear to match? FUG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I love the dress of the woman standing next to her, though… She gets a FAB!
Yes, that other dress is absolutely adorable and I crave it.
But…do they even look like they belong at the same FUNCTION?? How can both of those dresses be appropriate simultaneously? I really want to know which of them is either overdressed or underdressed (and I don’t mean underdressed in the sense that you’re not ACTUALLY WEARING A DRESS, Jessica White).
Almost went so very wrong? It IS so very wrong. It’s a terrible dress, worn badly. Yikes times a bazillion.
You know what? So glad she is wearing underwear and all, but I want to be able to assume everyone is wearing underwear, not be able to have evidence of yea or nay.
The mistake everyone is making is assuming it’s a dress. I think it’s an unhemmed bathing suit.
OK, tattoos, not my thing, whatever. But that collection makes her look like a 13-year-old doodled all over her during study hall.
Pretty, PRETTY, girl. Bad, BAD taste.
Her friend’s shoes are also awful.
The dress is a lovely colour, but she shows no class by showing so much of everything else. Her friend ‘s floral cushion cover of a dress is bad in a different way. Gives the lie to the chestnut that ‘models look good in anthing’ – (NO they don’t)
Maybe I’m in an overly charitable mood today, but I’m wondering if this thing didn’t just ride up around the middle when she wasn’t expecting it? It looks a little bunched up there, and maybe this looked fine when she put it on but got progressively worse with each step thereafter?
Theres nothing right with this dress. The tats are also ugly.
Honestly, for me the worst part is all that unsightly ink on her beautiful, beautiful skin. The dress has problems, but those could have been fixed by a good tailor, and the color is wonderful on her. But those distracting, ugly tattoos… awful. Nothing will work with those.
The front of the dress is squashing her boobs down towards her waist. Also extremely unflattering.
I don’t mind tatts as such but here they look dreadful.
I’m sorry, but this is so obviously FUG for me… The hideous tattoos… The scary shoulder blades… The fact we all know what kind of underwear she wore to the event… About the dress, it’s not a good thing there’s a ‘starrred sky’ pattern very similar to this in the 2004 “Barbie Fashion Designer” CD ROM game…
This is really horrible. The tattoos, the exposed zip, the exposed knickers…even the colours..no no no!! FUG…I’m genuinely wondering why this was a question!
Why would you do this to yourself if you were that pretty!!!!
Opposite everyone else, I think this hideous dress and shameful slit are messing with a lovely set of tattoos. I love tattoos. This shade of blue is a good color on her lovely skin though.
i too am done with the tattoos. i have friends with tattoos and some of them are gorgeous (the tattoos well and my friends too) but they don’t spend half of their life flashing their underwear on red carpets. tats are just too distracting.
She looks very prom skank. Easy access, no??! Well I love that dress that the other girl is wearing. Its cute.
Seems like the dress was an afterthought.
I do not see the “almost” here.
How can this be a “fug or fab”??? Is that…what I’m seeing? FUG – IN EVERY DIRECTION (except her cohort)
@Eliza Bennett. Thank you for saying that, ’cause that strip got me all capsy repeatedly yelling WHY? The dress is blue. Why, why, why the black back strip?
Flaunted to the hoo-hah. Get yer skinny ass home and cover your area–NObody wants to check out your underpants, I’m sure!
Her face and hair look fantastic and remind me of Josephine Baker. Perhaps that’s the inspiration for the near- flashing?
I’m torn between wanting her to pull it up a little higher so it doesn’t look like it’s going to drop the next time she breathes and OMG NO! NO HIGHER! So I’ll turn my attention to the other woman there. She’s pretty, I like her dress, she has gorgeous legs, and the shoes make it look dreadful. At first glance I thought she was wearing ankle socks, and my immediate thought was that I really hoped THAT wasn’t going to become a trend. At second glance I loved the shoes, but not with that dress. That dress needs plain but funky colored pumps.
WHERE IS OUR VOTING BUTTON
If I had skin that beautiful I could never purposely mar it with tats. Come on people. What used to be daring and interesting is now being done by your grandmother. Let ‘s move on.
She’s nice and tall and can wear this style beautifully. The tattoos on her back give an odd impression. I’m thinking this gown is better seen in person.