I can’t get over the fact that the Prime Minister’s wife appears to have a tat.
I KNOW! I was going to comment on that. Good for her.
I also kind of love the first pair of shoes. I’d wear them. Somewhere.
Serena’s shoes are so shiny, she’s gonna upskirt herself.
Oh, no, is “man feet” a thing?! I have size 11 feet and you’ve got me worried!
I have size 11 feet AND they’re wide. I know I have man feet. And also that I’d never be able to wear any of these shoes.
I don’t even mean width, I just mean… masculine.
Gwen Stefani’s shoes make me sick with jealousy.
In Tali Lennox’s photo is looks as though she is wearing a black shoe under the striped shroud, so. . . shoe cozies?
I think they look more like cute little purses that she stuffed her feet into, just to see if they’d fit.
But I like the idea of shoe cozies…
My feet are aching just looking at these shoes. Come on ladies, we don’t need to do this to ourselves! Think of the pinky toe! It’s our most important appendage!
I love F Jones’s shoes. They look actually wearable.
Serena totally needs to take care of her feet, but I am in awe of her wearing the hell out of shiny shoes that do nothing to obscure what are (I’m assuming) her various surgery scars. I can’t think of any other actrees/star/quasi-famous person who’d be willing to do that. As someone with a multitude of scars I’m always trying to hide, she’s an inspiration.
One of my biggest shoe related pet peeves is dark tights with light shoes. I’m looking at you Selma Blair. Absolutely horrid.
YES. Also, tights/socks/pantyhose with open toed shoes. Selma’s are peep toe, but still. NO.
The Prime Minister of Britain’s wife has a tat and is wearing wicked red f***-me pumps. What the Hell is the world coming to?
It’a frustrating to me that there’s no info on the first photo in these things. What are those things? Whose are they?
Those McQueen’s are so f****ed up, and this is coming from a woman who’s no stranger to ‘uncomfortable’ footwear. I’ve been known to say, “yeah, my feet hurt, but I look damn good in these shoes!” — but those things are just… wrong.
The first pair a simply ridiculous, and seen not to understand the basic ideas behind women’s shoes and foot anatomy. They should therefore only be worn with Stella McCartney’s clothes…
Nicky M… I’m pretty sure that having your ankle bones in front of your toes is a bad idea.
(God I can’t spell, that’s “are ridiculous” not “a …” and seem not seen, sigh)
$50 is as high as I’ll go for foot cats. Tops.
But I loved them when I thought they were little foxes.
Whitney Port’s are nude pumps that I can finally support. Also, let’s morph Selma Blair’s and Berenice Bejo’s shoes into one pair of sparkly pewter shoes with appropriately peeped toes (Selma’s) and unhoofified uppers, open over the arch (Berenice’s). Then, let’s NOT wear them over tights. As for the gratuitous purse shout out – screw the purse. I want that bracelet!
Ugly, ugly shoes. I don’t care if that’s the style, thank god there are still other designers out there that care about comfort and design.
All these are spectacularly fugly except the very plain black ones with the gold heel, and Gwen Stefani’s lurid purple leg-breakers have a certain something. I’m shocked at Mrs Cameron. Tats and hooker shoes. No class at all!
Something is wrong with me, but I loved Selma’s shiny shoes with the black vanishing heels. I thought they were shiny! I’m a magpie.
i just dont get it why people always classify red shoes as hooker shoes.. hers are esp divine and i would wear them everyday, everywhere..